Miami (Ohio)
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
450  Jess Hoover SO 20:53
490  Monica Fischer SR 20:57
622  Elisa Frazier SO 21:08
655  Julia Valencia SO 21:10
801  Brenna Poulsen SO 21:20
820  Anna Lamb SO 21:21
936  Erica Howes JR 21:30
1,048  Alex Chitwood SO 21:37
1,055  Amanda Hancock SO 21:38
1,200  Laura Bess SO 21:48
1,273  Melissa Girgis SO 21:52
1,695  Sarah Barker FR 22:19
1,719  Taylor Wickware SO 22:20
1,851  Mattie Moncayo SO 22:28
1,941  Kate Carter JR 22:34
2,031  Erin Riley JR 22:41
2,299  Mary Davis SO 23:00
National Rank #109 of 339
Great Lakes Region Rank #11 of 33
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 11th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 28.9%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Jess Hoover Monica Fischer Elisa Frazier Julia Valencia Brenna Poulsen Anna Lamb Erica Howes Alex Chitwood Amanda Hancock Laura Bess Melissa Girgis
Sean Earl Loyola Lakefront Invitational 09/29 1114 20:53 21:27 21:21 20:57 21:30 21:22 22:15 21:13 21:47 21:49
Pre-Nationals Meet (Red) 10/13 1026 20:46 20:41 20:56 21:09 21:18 21:10 21:37
Pre-Nationals Meet (Black) 10/13 21:11 21:30 21:46
Mid-American Conference Championships 10/27 1118 21:07 20:57 21:08 21:19 21:18 21:36 21:11 22:07 21:52
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/09 1088 20:47 20:55 21:09 21:17 21:15 21:20 21:40





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0% 31.0 736 0.0
Region Championship 100% 10.9 329 0.0 0.2 0.6 1.9 5.7 20.5 48.8 14.9 4.2 1.8 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jess Hoover 0.1% 144.5
Monica Fischer 0.1% 213.5
Elisa Frazier 0.0% 187.5
Julia Valencia 0.0% 195.5
Brenna Poulsen 0.0% 206.5
Anna Lamb 0.0% 223.5
Erica Howes 0.0% 247.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jess Hoover 51.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2
Monica Fischer 56.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0
Elisa Frazier 69.0 0.0 0.0
Julia Valencia 71.5 0.0 0.0
Brenna Poulsen 83.9
Anna Lamb 85.9
Erica Howes 95.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 0.0% 0.0 5
6 0.2% 12.5% 0.0 0.1 0.0 6
7 0.6% 0.6 7
8 1.9% 1.9 8
9 5.7% 5.7 9
10 20.5% 20.5 10
11 48.8% 48.8 11
12 14.9% 14.9 12
13 4.2% 4.2 13
14 1.8% 1.8 14
15 0.9% 0.9 15
16 0.2% 0.2 16
17 0.1% 0.1 17
18 0.0% 0.0 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
Total 100% 0.0% 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Baylor 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Ohio U. 0.0% 2.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 2.0